home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: pope.edunet.dk!user
- From: pope@edunet.dk (Povl H. Pedersen)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.programming
- Subject: Re: Which is better?
- Date: 5 Jan 1996 08:18:26 GMT
- Organization: edu!
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <pope-0501960921280001@pope.edunet.dk>
- References: <4bk4de$qcr$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> <860@sapphire.win-uk.net> <4cgefn$hjd@info-server.surrey.ac.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pope.edunet.dk
- X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.2
-
- In article <4cgefn$hjd@info-server.surrey.ac.uk>, C.Meenan@ee.surrey.ac.uk
- (Christopher G Meenan) wrote:
-
- :> If you do upgrade your Borland C++ complier, make sure it is to
- :> v5.0. This version was was promised in December 95, but there is
- :> no sign of it yet.
- :
- :
- :Borland told me it will be released in Feb 96.......
-
- Youi can also get a good well supported product like CodeWarrior. Runs
- only on the Mac, but comes complete with MFC 3.0. Updates every 4 months.
- Will produce code for Mac 68k, Mac PowerPC, BeBox and Win32.
-
- The compiler is faster than almost anything under Windows.
-
- For Win16 you still need another compiler though.
-
- --
- Povl H. Pedersen - pope@edunet.dk
- Macintosh / Unix / Win (aaargghh) programmer - System Administrator
- Microsoft philosophy since 1984: Why innovate when you can immitate
-